Comparative Analysis of the Discursive Interaction of Two Mathematics Edutubers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33732/ixc/13/02AnalisKeywords:
Metadiscourse, Interpersonal Model, Discursive Interaction, YouTube, edutubers, MathematicsAbstract
The new digital environments have allowed the creation of multimedia content that can reach a large number of users. YouTube is used by teachers who create educational content, and it is pertinent to ask about the discursive interaction that creators establish with their users. In this research, two YouTube channels dedicated to teaching mathematics, Unicoos and Matemáticas profe Alex, are compared to assess whether there are significant differences in terms of discursive interaction. The identification of the discursive interaction was made through the metadiscourse applying the interpersonal model. A qualitative content analysis was carried out and the Chi-square test was applied. The results show that there are significant differences in terms of the discursive interaction between the two edutubers. These differences are reflected in the way they interact and the use of questions, in the incorporation of markers of personal contributions and the markers shared knowledge. The use of dialogical strategies is not done with a pedagogical purpose, although the content produced is educational. This research is relevant because it shows the need to design educational content with pedagogical and dialogical intentionality.
Metrics
References
ACEVEDO BORREGA, J., SOSA DÍAZ, M. J., PORRAS MAESERO, I., & GONZÁLEZ FERNÁN-DEZ, A. (2022). Digital Resources in Higher Education: TikTok as a teaching tool. Reidocrea-Revista Electrónica De Investigación Y Docencia Creativa, 11, 623-636. https://tinyurl.com/53sef9pv
ÄDEL, A. (2021). Reflections on Reflexivity in Digital Communication: Towards a Third Wave of Metadiscourse Studies. En Metadiscourse in Digital Commu-nication. Palgrave MacMillan.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85814-8_3
ÄDEL, A. (2023). Adopting a 'move' rather than a 'marker' approach to meta-discourse: A taxonomy for spoken student presentations. English for Specif-ic Purposes, 69, 4-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2022.09.001
ÁLVAREZ, M. Á., & GONZÁLEZ, A. N. R. (2022). Descubriendo qué estrategias de dialogicidad y posicionamiento se emplean en las introducciones y conclu-siones de trabajos fin de grado. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comuni-cación, 90, 21-33. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.81302
ANZOLA-GOMEZ, J., RIVERA-ROGEL, D., & AGUADED, I. (2022). Interacción social e interacción discursiva de un canal de YouTube educativo. Fonseca, Journal of Communication, (25). https://doi.org/10.14201/fjc.29406
BAJTÍN, M. (1982). Estética de la creación verbal. Siglo veintiuno editores.
BELTRÁN-FLANDOLI, A. M., PÉREZ-RODRÍGUEZ, A., & MATEUS, J.-C. (2023). YouTube como ciberaula. Revisión crítica de su uso pedagógico en la Universidad Ibe-roamericana. RIED-Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5944/ried.26.1.34372
BELTRÁN-PELLICER, P., GIACOMONE, B., & BURGOS, M. (2018). Online educational videos according to specific didactics: The case of mathematics. Cultura y Educación, 30(4), 633-662. https://doi.org/10.1080/11356405.2018.1524651
BURGOS, M., BELTRÁN-PELLICER, P., & GODINO, J. D. (2020). The issue of didactical suitability in mathematics educational videos: Experience of analysis with prospective primary school teachers. Revista Española de Pedagogía, 78(275), 27-49. https://doi.org/10.22550/REP78-1-2020-07
CORDOBA, R., CELLY-ALVARADO, S., & RIVERA-ROGEL, D. (2021). Edutubers ecuato-rianos: Impacto y mejoras en los contenidos de aprendizaje. Congreso Inter-nacional de Innovación y Tendencias Educativas. INNTED. https://tinyurl.com/mtksymj8
CROSTHWAITE, P., BOYNTON, S., & COLE, S., III. (2017). Exploring rater conceptions of academic stance and engagement during group tutorial discussion as-sessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 28, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2017.04.004
DANIEL, F. O., & UNUABONAH, F. O. (2021). Stance and engagement in selected Ni-gerian Supreme Court judgments. English Text Construction, 14(2), 231-252. https://doi.org/10.1075/etc.21021.dan
DATAREPORTAL. (2022). Digital 2022 Global Overview Report. https://tinyurl.com/yzbx32av
ESTÉVEZ, I., SOUTO-SEIJO, A., & GONZÁLEZ-SANMAMED, M. (2021). El estudio de caso en la investigación de las ecologías de aprendizaje del docente universitario. New Trends in Qualitative Research, 5, 104-115. https://doi.org/10.36367/ntqr.5.2021.104-115
FIEIRAS-CEIDE, C., VAZ-ÁLVAREZ, M., & TÚÑEZ-LÓPEZ, M. (2022). Artificial intelli-gence strategies in European public broadcasters: Uses, forecasts and future challenges. Profesional de la información, 31(5). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.sep.18
FIERRO-SUERO, S., VELÁZQUEZ-AHUMADA, N., & FERNÁNDEZ-ESPÍNOLA, C. (2021). The influence of the classroom climate on the student's emotions. Retos, 42, 434-442. https://doi.org/10.47197/retos.v42i0.87305
FLOWERDEW, J. (2015). Revisiting metadiscourse: Conceptual and methodologi-cal issues concerning signalling nouns. Ibérica: Revista de La Asociación Eu-ropea de Lenguas Para Fines Específicos (AELFE), (29), 15-34. https://tinyurl.com/2tycr436
FREIRE, P. (1970). La pedagogía del oprimido. Siglo XXI Editores.
FREIRE, P. (1994). Cartas a quien pretende enseñar. Siglo XXI.
FREIRE, P. (1996). Pedagogía de la autonomía. Paz e Terra S.A.
FREIRE, P., & FAUDEZ, A. (2013). Por una pedagogía de la pregunta. Siglo Vein-tiuno Editores.
GARCÍA-MARÍN, D., & SALVAT-MARTINREY, G. (2022). Viralizar la verdad. Factores predictivos del engagement en el contenido verificado en TikTok. Profesio-nal de la información, 31(2). https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.mar.10
GONZÁLEZ-SANMAMED, M., SANGRÀ, A., SOUTO-SEIJO, A., & BLANCO, I. E. (2018). Eco-logías de aprendizaje en la Era Digital: Desafíos para la Educación Superior. PUBLICACIONES, 48(1).
https://doi.org/10.30827/publicaciones.v48i1.7329
GREEN, S., PAGE, F., DE'ATH, P., PEI, E., & LAM, B. (2019). VUCA challenges on the design-engineering student spectrum. Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education: Towards a New Innovation Landscape, E and PDE 2019.
https://doi.org/10.35199/epde2019.100
GULSON, K. N., & WITZENBERGER, K. (2022). Repackaging authority: Artificial in-telligence, automated governance and education trade shows. Journal of Ed-ucation Policy, 37(1), 145-160.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1785552
HERNÁNDEZ, R., FERNÁNDEZ-COLLADO, C., & BAPTISTA, P. (2014). Metodología de la Investigación (6.ª ed.). McGraw Hill.
HERRERA, C. D. (2018). Investigación cualitativa y análisis de contenido temáti-co. Orientación intelectual de revista Universum. Revista General de Infor-mación y Documentación, 28(1). https://doi.org/10.5209/RGID.60813
HYLAND, K. (2005). Stance and engagement: A model of interaction in academic discourse. Discourse Studies, 7(2), 173-192.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1461445605050365
HYLAND, K. (2017). Metadiscourse: What is it and where is it going? Journal of Pragmatics, 113, 16-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.03.007
HYLAND, K., & JIANG, F. (KEVIN). (2016). "We must conclude that…": A diachronic study of academic engagement. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 24, 29-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2016.09.003
HYLAND, K., & TSE, P. (2004). Metadiscourse in Academic Writing: A Reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-177.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/25.2.156
HYLAND, K., WANG, W., & (KEVIN) JIANG, F. (2022). Metadiscourse across lan-guages and genres: An overview. Lingua, 265, 103205.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2021.103205
HYLAND, K., & ZOU, H. (2022). Pithy Persuasion: Engagement in 3 Minute Thesis Presentations. Applied Linguistics, 43(1), 21-44.
https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab017
IAB ESPAÑA. (2022). Estudio de Redes Sociales 2022. https://tinyurl.com/3xb7zshf
JACOBSON, R. (1985). Lingüística y Poética. Cátedra.
KAPLÚN, G. (2022). Educomunicación y ecología de saberes: Territorios y di-mensiones de una práctica social. En Redes sociales y ciudadanía. Cibercultu-ras para el aprendizaje (pp. 319-324). Grupo Comunicar. https://tinyurl.com/2p86tuna
KAPLÚN, M. (2002). Una pedagogía de la comunicación. Editorial Caminos.
LAURENCE, A. (2022). AntConc (4.1.1).
http://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.html
LOZANO-BLASCO, R., MIRA-ALADRÉN, M., & GIL-LAMATA, M. (2023). Redes sociales y su influencia en los jóvenes y niños: Análisis en Instagram, Twitter y YouTube. Comunicar, 31(74). https://doi.org/10.3916/C74-2023-10
MORATÓN, L., & LAVID, J. (2018). Stance and engagement in English and Spanish journalistic texts: Towards a reliable annotation scheme for linguistic and computational purposes. Studia Linguistica Universitatis Iagellonicae Cra-coviensis, 135(1), 29-45. https://doi.org/10.4467/20834624SL.18.003.8163
ORTEGA-RODRÍGUEZ, P. J. (2022). From Extended Reality to The Metaverse: A Critical Reflection on Contributions to Education. Teoría de la Educación, 34(2), 189-208. https://doi.org/10.14201/teri.27864
PASCUAL, D., & DUEÑAS, M. P. M. (2022). Dialogic interaction with diversified au-diences in Twitter for Research Dissemination Purposes. Círculo de Lingüís-tica Aplicada a La Comunicación, 90, 61-79. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.81307
PATTIER, D. (2020). Mirando al futuro: Cómo influir en educación a través de un canal de youtube. Revista Tecnologí¬a Educativa, 5(1). https://tinyurl.com/4ejmwcup
PATTIER, D. (2021). Educating in art and culture through youtube: The impact of edutubers. Komunikacija i kultura online, (12).
https://doi.org/10.18485/kkonline.2021.12.12.10
PATTIER, D. (2022a). Diseño y validación de instrumento para analizar canales educativos de YouTube. Revista ICONO 14. Revista científica de Comunica-ción y Tecnologías emergentes, 20(2).
https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v20i2.1818
PATTIER, D. (2022b). Enseñando matemáticas a través de YouTube: El caso de los edutubers españoles. Digital Education Review, (42).
https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2022.42.65-80
PILSHCHIKOV, I. (2021). El esquema comunicativo de Roman Jakobson entre len-guas y continentes: Historia cruzada del modelo teórico. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (77). https://doi.org/10.7440/res77.2021.01
QIU, X., & JIANG, F. (2021). Stance and engagement in 3MT presentations: How students communicate disciplinary knowledge to a wide audience. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 100976.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100976
RICHTER, E., CARPENTER, J. P., MEYER, A., & RICHTER, D. (2022). Instagram as a plat-form for teacher collaboration and digital social support. Computers & Edu-cation, 190, 104624. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104624
RIEDER, B. (2015, mayo 4). Introducing the YouTube Data Tools. The Politics of Systems.
http://thepoliticsofsystems.net/2015/05/exploring-youtube/
RIVERA-ROGEL, D., RODRÍGUEZ-HIDALGO, C., BELTRÁN-FLANDOLI, A. M., & CÓRDOVA-TAPIA, R. (2022). Narrative of Young YouTubers From the Andean Communi-ty and Their Media Competence. Media and Communication, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i1.4771
SÁNCHEZ-JIMÉNEZ, D. (2022). El metadiscurso en la escritura académica: Singula-ridades e investigaciones en lengua española. En Contenidos del Neo-Humanismo del siglo XXI (pp. 423-436). Tirant lo Blanch. https://tinyurl.com/s7yxzdjj
SÁNCHEZ-JIMÉNEZ, D., & MEZA, P. (2022). Posicionamiento y dialogicidad en la es-critura académica y profesional. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comu-nicación, 90, 1-4. https://doi.org/10.5209/clac.75958
SANMAMED, M. G., FERNÁNDEZ, J. T., & CRUZ, M. F. (2021). Ecologías de aprendizaje: Oportunidades para la formación en la sociedad en red. Educatio Siglo XXI, 39(2). https://revistas.um.es/educatio/article/view/483471
SERNA, V. O.-, & GARCÍA-RUIZ, R. (2022). Divulgación científica en YouTube en Latinoamérica. Estudio de Casos de universidades, museos y YouTubers. Re-vista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 19(2).
https://doi.org/10.25267/Rev_Eureka_ensen_divulg_cienc.2022.v19.i2.2204
SILVA, A. J. B. DA, & VOLTOLINI, A. G. M. F. DA F. (2019). Matemática, Software e YouTube: Possibilidades para professores e alunos em sala de aula. Research, Society and Development, 8(4).
https://doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v8i4.950
SUI, W., RUSH, J., & RHODES, R. E. (2022). Engagement With Web-Based Fitness vídeos on YouTube and Instagram During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Longitu-dinal Study. JMIR Formative Research, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.2196/25055
URIBE, H. R., GUTIÉRREZ-RÍOS, M., VARGA, Z., & VIVES, M. (2020). El diálogo en la construcción de la intersubjetividad crítica. Actualidades Pedagógicas, 1(75), 183-204. https://doi.org/10.19052/ap.vol1.iss75.9
VALVERDE-MAESTRE, Á. M., GÓMEZ-PÉREZ, F. J., & RUFÍ, J. P. P. (2022). Youtubers en Latinoamérica: Modelos de producción de los canales de YouTube con más suscriptores y expectativas de crecimiento. adComunica, 201-224. https://doi.org/10.6035/adcomunica.6475
VÁSQUEZ, M. C., EJJABERI, A. E., CHUECA, P. A., & IVERN, X. T. (2021). Relación entre el engagement por uso de redes sociales y la práctica de ejercicio físico en los centros deportivos municipales de Barcelona. Revista Latina de Comunica-ción Social, (79). https://doi.org/10.4185/RLCS-2021-1501
YE, S., HARTMANN, R. W., SODERSTROM, M., AMIN, M. A., SKILLINGHAUG, B., SCHEMBRI, L. S., & ODELL, L. R. (2020). Turning Information Dissipation into Dissemina-tion: Instagram as a Communication Enhancing Tool during the COVID-19 Pandemic and Beyond. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(9), 3217-3222. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.0c00724
YOUTUBE. (2023). YouTube About. https://www.youtube.com/about
ZAL, N., & MOINI, M. R. (2021). The use of interactional metadiscourse markers in English book reviews across disciplines. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 12(3), 477-488. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1203.18
ZOU, H. (JOANNA), & HYLAND, K. (2020). "Think about how fascinating this is": Engagement in academic blogs across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 43, 100809. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2019.100809
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 John Anzola, Dra (Autor/a)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who submit to this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and ensure the magazine's right to be the first publication of the work as licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoComercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of authorship of the work and the initial publication in this magazine, with no commercial purpose.
Authors can establish separate additional agreements for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in the magazine (for example, to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
It allows and authors are encouraged to disseminate their work electronically (eg, in institutional repositories or on their own website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as a citation more early and most of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).